Ghada Ismail

Every startup commences its journey with an idea. Some ideas are clever. Some are perfectly timed. A few even feel like they could change an industry. But here’s the reality most founders discover pretty quickly: having a good idea isn’t the hard part anymore.

The hard part is keeping that idea yours.

In today’s crowded startup world, once you build something valuable, others will notice. Competitors copy. Bigger players move faster. Well-funded companies enter your space. That’s when one uncomfortable question shows up:

What stops someone else from doing this better?

That question is all about ‘Defensibility’.

What Defensibility Actually Means

Defensibility is your startup’s ability to hold its ground over time. It’s not about being first to market. And it’s definitely not about having the flashiest product.

It’s about being hard to replace.

A defensible startup gets stronger as it grows. More customers make the product better. More usage creates smarter systems. Deeper integrations make it painful to switch away. Over time, competitors don’t just have to match your product; they have to overcome everything you’ve already built.

The Defensibility Traps Founders Fall Into

Many founders believe their startup is defensible because they have:

• A great product
• Strong execution
• Early traction
• A compelling brand story

All of these help. None of them are enough on their own.

Great products get copied. Execution advantages don’t last forever. Early traction attracts competition. Brand takes years—and serious money—to truly protect you. These things help you get started, but they don’t guarantee survival.

Real defensibility usually sits below the surface.

Where Real Defensibility Comes From

One of the strongest forms of defensibility is network effects. When your product becomes more valuable as more people use it, new competitors face a tough uphill climb. Marketplaces, payment platforms, and collaboration tools often benefit from this.

Another is data, but only the right kind. Startups that collect unique, hard-to-replicate data can improve their product in ways others can’t. This matters a lot in AI-driven businesses, but only if the data truly improves outcomes and isn’t easily available elsewhere.

Switching costs also matter. If your product becomes deeply embedded in how customers work—through workflows, integrations, or processes—leaving becomes expensive and risky. This is common in B2B software, fintech platforms, and enterprise tools.

In regulated industries, compliance and licensing can become a strong shield. Fintech, healthtech, and infrastructure startups often spend years navigating approvals. That effort alone can discourage competitors from entering the space.

Finally, scale can protect you. If growing larger significantly lowers your costs or improves your margins, latecomers struggle to compete without burning cash.

Defensibility Is Built Over Time

A common myth is that startups must be defensible from day one. That’s rarely true.

Early on, speed matters more than protection. Learning fast, serving customers, and refining the product should come first. Defensibility grows as you accumulate trust, users, data, partnerships, and credibility.

Your Market Choice Matters More Than You Think

Some markets make defensibility easier. Others fight you every step of the way.

If you’re operating in a space with low switching costs, no network effects, and endless substitutes, you’ll need near-perfect execution just to survive. On the other hand, markets tied to infrastructure, regulation, or ecosystems give you more room to build long-term advantages.

While a good market won’t guarantee success, a bad one can make defensibility almost impossible.

Defensibility Is a Founder Mindset

Defensibility isn’t just about technology. It’s about how founders think.

Strong founders constantly ask:
What gets stronger as we grow?
What becomes harder for competitors over time?
Where does our leverage come from?
What would a well-funded rival struggle to copy?

These questions shape everything, starting from product decisions to pricing, partnerships, and hiring.

To Wrap Things Up…

Defensibility doesn’t mean being unbeatable. It means being harder to beat every year.

In a world where money moves fast and ideas spread even faster, the startups that last aren’t always the first or the loudest. They’re the ones quietly building advantages that stack over time.

So here’s the question every founder should sit with:

If your startup disappeared tomorrow, how easy would it be for someone else to replace it?

If that question makes you uneasy, that’s a good thing. It means you know where the real work needs to begin.

Noha Gad

Companies in the world of business grow through careful planning and friendly agreements. Leaders talk about partnership, shared goals, and future success. Yet there exists a more aggressive path to growth, where such collaboration is not welcome, and the fight for control is direct and fierce. This path is defined by a direct and forceful attempt to seize control against the clear wishes of the existing leadership.

This action is known as a hostile takeover. It happens when a company tries to buy another company against the wishes of its leaders, unlike friendly takeovers, where both companies agree. The buyer ignores the management and appeals directly to the company's owners and shareholders. It is a high-stakes contest that can change companies, industries, and careers.

What is a hostile takeover?

A hostile takeover happens when an entity takes control of a company against the wishes of the company's management. The company being acquired in a hostile takeover is called the target company, while the one executing the takeover is called the acquirer. 

This strategy requires the entity to acquire and control more than 50% of the company’s voting shares, allowing the new majority shareholders to control the acquired business. Key parties of a hostile takeover are: the buyer, the company or group that wants control; the target company, the firm being bought, whose leaders resist with plans and lawsuits; the shareholders; the owners who hold shares; and the regulators, government bodies that check for fair play and market rules.

How does it work?

A hostile takeover follows set steps in which the buyer acts with care and speed. These steps are:

       * Selecting and reviewing the target. The buyer chooses a company, then checks the share price, debt, and profits. The worth of the target company must be more than its market value.

       * Buying shares. The buyer starts with small purchases, using brokers to stay hidden.

       * Making a public offer. In this step, the buyer goes public, files with the regulations, and offers cash for shares.

       * Raising funds. The buyer can raise money through multiple options, including its own cash reserves, issuing new shares, securing loans, or partnering with banks and investors.

       * Proxy fight (if needed). If the offer does not succeed, the buyer launches a proxy fight by seeking shareholder votes to elect new board members, which allows changes to company rules that favor the takeover.

       * Securing approvals. In this step, regulators review and approve the deal to ensure compliance with antitrust laws and market protections.

       * Taking control. By securing over 50% of shares, the buyer can assume control, appoint new leadership, and complete the acquisition.

Defense strategies against hostile takeovers

Companies can follow different strategies to prevent unwanted hostile takeovers. These strategies are:

       -Differential Voting Rights (DVRs). Through this strategy, the company can establish stock with differential voting rights (DVRs), where some shares carry greater voting power than others. This makes it more difficult to generate the votes needed for a hostile takeover if management owns a large portion of shares.

       -Employee Stock Ownership Program (ESOP). The ESOP involves using a tax-qualified plan in which employees own a substantial interest in the company. Employees can be more likely to vote with management.

       -Crown Jewel. In this defense strategy, a provision of the company’s bylaws requires the sale of the most valuable assets if there is a hostile takeover, thereby making it less attractive as a takeover opportunity.

       - Poison Pill (officially known as a shareholder rights plan). This tactic allows existing shareholders to buy newly-issued stock at a discount if one shareholder has bought more than a stipulated percentage of the stock, resulting in a dilution of the ownership interest of the acquiring company. There are two types of poison pill defenses: the flip-in and flip-over. A flip-in allows existing shareholders to buy new stock at a discount if someone accumulates a specified number of shares of the target company, while the flip-over strategy allows the target company's shareholders to purchase the acquiring company's stock at a deeply discounted price if the takeover goes through.

Hostile takeovers produce both positive effects and serious issues for companies, shareholders, and markets, often sparking debate about their overall value. They unlock higher value for shareholders by offering premiums on shares that reflect the company's true worth, while driving better operations through new leadership that cuts waste and boosts efficiency in areas like fintech innovation. On the other side, they carry risks such as job losses when the buyer reduces staff to lower costs and a focus on short-term gains that ignores long-term growth plans. Some view hostile takeovers as healthy competition that rewards strong owners, whereas others see them as predatory actions that harm workers and stable businesses.

Finally, the path of the hostile takeover presents a different and more confrontational alternative. This process, defined by the direct acquisition of a target company against the expressed wishes of its leadership, unfolds as a high-stakes contest for control, fundamentally reshaping organizations and markets. These takeovers can serve as a powerful instrument of market discipline; however, they carry significant negative consequences.

Ultimately, hostile takeovers embody the tension between the aggressive pursuit of opportunity and the principles of corporate autonomy and strategic continuity. While it can act as a catalyst for positive change and value creation, it also represents a potentially disruptive and predatory force.

Kholoud Hussein 

In the world of startups, few concepts are as feared or as misunderstood as the “Death Valley Curve.” The term sounds dramatic, but it describes a very real and common phase in a young company’s life. Many promising startups do not fail because their ideas are bad. They fail because they cannot survive this critical stretch between early promise and sustainable growth.

The Death Valley Curve refers to the period when a startup’s expenses consistently exceed its revenues, often for longer than expected. On a financial graph, cash flow dips deep into negative territory before it has a chance to recover. If the company runs out of cash before reaching profitability or securing new funding, the journey ends there.

This phase usually appears after initial product development and early market entry. Founders may have validated an idea, built a minimum viable product, and even signed their first customers. But revenues remain modest, while costs rise sharply. Salaries, marketing spend, infrastructure, compliance, and customer acquisition all add pressure. At the same time, investor enthusiasm may cool if growth is slower than projected.

The danger of the Death Valley Curve lies in its timing. Startups often enter it with confidence, assuming revenue growth will accelerate quickly. In reality, sales cycles are longer, customer acquisition costs are higher, and operational complexity increases faster than planned. The result is a widening gap between cash coming in and cash going out.

Avoiding the Death Valley Curve entirely is rare. Managing it successfully is the real goal.

One of the most effective ways startups can reduce risk is by maintaining disciplined cash management from day one. This means knowing exactly how long the company’s runway is and regularly updating that forecast. Founders should be able to answer a simple question at any time: how many months can we operate if no new revenue or funding arrives? Startups that track this closely can make early adjustments rather than react in crisis mode.

Another critical strategy is pacing growth deliberately. Many startups fail not because they grow too slowly, but because they grow too fast. Hiring aggressively, expanding into multiple markets, or building features before demand is proven can push costs higher without increasing revenue. Smart startups focus on the few activities that directly support customer acquisition and retention, and delay everything else.

Customer validation also plays a central role in surviving this phase. Startups that listen closely to users and adapt quickly are more likely to reach product-market fit before cash runs out. This often means saying no to custom requests that do not scale, refining pricing models early, and ensuring the product solves a real, recurring problem. Revenue quality matters as much as revenue volume.

Access to capital is another factor, but it should not be the only safety net. Relying on future funding rounds without demonstrating progress is risky, especially during tighter market conditions. Investors increasingly look for evidence of traction, efficient use of capital, and a clear path to sustainability. Startups that can show improving unit economics are in a much stronger position to raise funds in the Valley.

Finally, leadership mindset matters. Founders who acknowledge the Death Valley Curve as a normal phase are better prepared to handle it. This includes transparent communication with teams, realistic goal setting, and the willingness to make hard decisions early. Cutting costs or pivoting strategy is far easier when done proactively rather than under pressure.

The Death Valley Curve is not a sign of failure. It is a test. Startups that survive it do so by combining financial discipline, focused execution, and constant learning. Those that emerge on the other side are often stronger, more resilient, and better equipped for long-term success.

Ghada Ismail

Mining is no longer a background industry in Saudi Arabia’s economic story. As the Kingdom works to reduce its dependence on oil, mining has moved to the forefront of its diversification agenda. Under Vision 2030, the sector is being positioned as the third pillar of Saudi Arabia’s industrial economy, standing alongside oil and petrochemicals. According to the Ministry of Industry and Mineral Resources, the Kingdom’s untapped mineral wealth is valued at more than SAR 9.3 trillion, including gold, copper, phosphate, bauxite, rare earth elements, and other critical minerals that are increasingly essential to the global energy transition and advanced manufacturing.

This push comes at a moment when global demand for minerals is accelerating, driven by renewable energy technologies, electric vehicles, and the digital infrastructure powering modern economies. Saudi Arabia sees an opportunity to establish itself as a major global mining hub. But turning geological potential into long-term value is not straightforward. Mining in harsh desert environments, often far from major population centers, is capital-intensive and operationally complex. Staying competitive requires smarter, safer, and more sustainable ways of working.

This is where artificial intelligence is beginning to change the game.

Across the mining value chain, AI is emerging as a powerful enabler, spanning early-stage exploration to daily operations, safety management, and environmental monitoring. By embedding AI into mining processes, Saudi companies are improving productivity, cutting costs, and making faster, better-informed decisions. At the same time, this shift is opening the door to a broader innovation ecosystem, drawing in startups, research institutions, and technology providers eager to help shape the future of mining in the Kingdom.

AI in Exploration and Operations

Mineral exploration has always been a high-risk, high-cost endeavor. Traditional methods rely on years of geological surveys, drilling campaigns, and lab analysis, often with no guarantee of a viable discovery. AI is helping tilt the odds.

Machine learning models can now process vast volumes of data—satellite images, geophysical surveys, and decades of historical records—to identify patterns that would be nearly impossible for humans to detect. These systems can flag promising areas for exploration with greater accuracy, allowing companies to focus their investments where the likelihood of success is highest and avoid unnecessary drilling.

Saudi Arabian Mining Company (Ma’aden), the Kingdom’s flagship mining firm, has been actively exploring AI-driven tools to enhance exploration and resource modeling. By integrating advanced analytics into its workflows, Ma’aden has improved its ability to assess ore quality, estimate reserves, and shorten exploration timelines, making investment decisions more efficient and data-driven.

Once a mine is operational, AI continues to deliver value. Autonomous equipment and robotics are increasingly taking on tasks that were once labor-intensive and dangerous. Self-driving haul trucks, AI-assisted drilling systems, and automated processing plants are enabling more consistent, around-the-clock operations with reduced human exposure to risk.

Downtime is another costly challenge in mining. AI-powered predictive maintenance systems help address this by continuously monitoring equipment performance through sensors and real-time data feeds. Instead of reacting to breakdowns after they happen, operators can anticipate failures, schedule maintenance in advance, and extend the life of critical machinery. The result is lower operating costs and more reliable production.

Back in 2023, a notable initiative in this context is Ma’aden’s partnership with OffWorld, which develops AI-driven swarm robotic systems for autonomous mining tasks. These robots can perform repetitive or hazardous operations with minimal human intervention, enhancing safety and operational precision while enabling fully automated mining workflows in the Kingdom.

AI is also transforming ore processing and refining. Intelligent systems can adjust processing parameters on the fly based on the composition of incoming ore, improving recovery rates while reducing waste. For Saudi Arabia, where maximizing the value of each extracted resource is central to long-term sustainability, these efficiencies are particularly important.

AI in Safety and Sustainability

Mining will always carry inherent risks, but AI is helping make worksites safer and more controlled. Advanced monitoring systems now allow operators to oversee conditions across vast and often remote mining sites in real time.

AI-powered cameras, drones, and computer vision tools can detect structural weaknesses, monitor equipment behavior, and flag unsafe practices before they escalate into serious incidents. Video analytics, for example, can identify whether workers are complying with safety protocols, helping reduce accidents without relying solely on manual supervision.

Automation also plays a role in safety. Remote-controlled and autonomous machinery reduces the need for workers to operate in high-risk environments such as deep underground tunnels or extreme heat zones. This not only lowers accident rates but also improves precision and operational consistency.

Environmental sustainability is another area where AI is making a tangible impact. Mining can place heavy demands on water, energy, and land resources, especially in arid regions like Saudi Arabia. AI-driven systems help companies monitor and manage these impacts more effectively.

Water optimization tools analyze usage patterns in processing plants and recommend ways to reduce consumption without compromising output. Energy management systems adjust power usage in response to operational needs, cutting waste and lowering emissions. Satellite imagery and drone-based monitoring enable companies to track land rehabilitation efforts, detect pollution risks early, and ensure compliance with environmental regulations.

These capabilities align closely with Saudi Arabia’s broader sustainability ambitions and its goal of setting higher standards for responsible mining.

Industry Ecosystem and Opportunities

The rise of AI in Saudi mining is not just benefiting large corporations. It is also creating space for startups, technology firms, and research institutions to play a meaningful role.

Lithium Infinity (Lihytech), for example, a Saudi mining tech company, is developing advanced lithium extraction solutions, targeting minerals essential for batteries and the global energy transition. While AI is not yet native to their operations, these technologies are highly compatible with AI-driven optimization and automation.

Incubated by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Lihytech represents a growing ecosystem where innovation meets industrial needs. With government programs supporting AI adoption and workforce development, startups like Lihytech have a chance to bridge technology gaps and accelerate the Kingdom’s journey toward smart mining.

Opportunities are emerging in areas such as geological data analytics, drone-based surveying, autonomous systems, and digital twins—virtual replicas of mining operations that allow companies to simulate scenarios, test improvements, and optimize workflows without disrupting live operations.

Challenges Are Still Ahead

At the same time, where the field is rich in opportunities, challenges remain. One of the biggest is data fragmentation, with geological and operational information often spread across disconnected systems. Startups specializing in data integration and AI compatibility could play a key role in bridging these gaps.

Workforce readiness is another hurdle. As mining becomes more data-driven, demand is growing for skills in AI, automation, and digital systems. Training platforms, simulation tools, and AI-enabled upskilling solutions will be essential to preparing the next generation of mining professionals.

Government support is helping accelerate this transition. The Ministry of Industry and Mineral Resources has been actively promoting digital transformation across the sector, while programs under Vision 2030 aim to localize mining technologies and encourage collaboration between miners and tech providers. Initiatives such as the Saudi Geological Survey’s National Geological Database are improving access to critical mining and geological data, enabling researchers, investors, and industry players to make more informed decisions. The National Industrial Development and Logistics Program (NIDLP) is supporting the sector by fostering innovation, local technology adoption, and integration across industrial value chains. Meanwhile, the Kingdom’s National Strategy for Data and AI, led by SDAIA, provides a strong framework for adopting AI technologies across industrial sectors, including mining, helping drive digital transformation and long-term competitiveness under Vision 2030.

Recent Industry Milestone
The sector’s momentum was highlighted at the fifth Future Minerals Forum, held in Riyadh in January 2026, which drew over 21,500 participants from governments, investors, and technical experts worldwide. The forum, themed “Dawn of a Global Cause,” showcased Saudi Arabia’s growing role as a hub for responsible mineral development and innovation. Over the course of the event, participants signed 132 agreements and memoranda of understanding worth approximately USD 26.6 billion, covering exploration, financing, R&D, innovation, and sustainability initiatives. Key recommendations emphasized accelerating the adoption of advanced technologies, strengthening regulatory frameworks, expanding investment incentives, and fostering global collaboration to secure resilient and sustainable mineral supply chains. The forum’s outcomes underline the Kingdom’s commitment to both technological innovation and long-term sustainability in mining.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping Saudi Arabia’s mining sector, changing how minerals are discovered, extracted, and processed. By improving exploration accuracy, streamlining operations, enhancing safety, and strengthening environmental stewardship, AI is helping the industry overcome long-standing challenges.

Beyond operational gains, AI is also catalyzing a broader innovation ecosystem, creating new opportunities for startups, technology providers, and research institutions to contribute to the Kingdom’s mining ambitions. Backed by government support and growing private sector investment, Saudi Arabia is steadily building a smarter, more resilient mining industry.

As global competition for critical minerals intensifies, the Kingdom’s AI-driven approach offers a compelling model for sustainable and technology-led resource development. By combining vast mineral resources with advanced digital capabilities, Saudi Arabia is not just diversifying its economy but also redefining what modern mining can look like in the decades ahead.

Noha Gad

Commerce worldwide is entering a new era where artificial intelligence (AI) agents not only assist but also act. Agentic commerce represents a fundamental shift from manual clicks to autonomous, goal-driven systems that can reason, plan, and transact on behalf of users. Unlike traditional automation, AI agents operate through a complete cognitive cycle: possessing goals, memory, and specific instructions, offering enormous potential for companies to transform their operations as never before. Agentic AI represents a sophisticated framework with tools and protocols that enable intelligent systems to interact seamlessly with other systems, agents, and humans. 

In Saudi Arabia, the e-commerce sector is booming. According to recent figures by the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA), online spending via Mada cards surged to SAR 90.9 billion in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2025. This growth is driven by a young, tech- savvy population and extensive Internet access. In recent years, the retail experience has been transformed by the move from cash to digital payments. The emergence of agentic commerce in Saudi Arabia will bring an era of hyper-personalized, automated shopping experience, where AI agents can anticipate needs, show the best choices, restock essentials, and manage purchases in real time.

“Agentic commerce could be highly rewarding for retailers ready to seize its opportunities and efficiencies. Merchants that act now will put themselves in a strong position to prosper,” said Rob Cameron, Global Head of Visa Acceptance Solutions. In his recent article, Cameron highlighted the Kingdom’s efforts to embrace new shopping ways. In 2024, non-cash retail transactions in the Kingdom reached 79%, surpassing Vision 2030’s target of 70%. He emphasized that Saudi residents are likely adopt agentic commerce with the same enthusiasm, highlighting that the challenge for merchants will not just be to deliver the goods, but to do so in ways that keep both human and silicon shoppers coming back.

How it works

Saudi Arabia views agentic AI as a booster for the national economy, as SDAIA’s ALLaM model and HUMAIN localizing tech for different industries, notably e-commerce. Agentic commerce in the Kingdom centers on AI agents autonomously managing shopping, payments, and supply chains, triggered by Vision 2030's digital economy goals and high non-cash transaction rates. AI agents execute full shopping journeys, from need anticipation and deal negotiation to payments, shifting from shopper-led to agent-led processes with human oversight at key points such as approvals. For merchants, those agents enable hyper-personalization, restocking, fraud detection, and back-office tasks, such as invoicing, ultimately bolstering customer engagement via chatbots and recommendations. 

Saudi Arabia is an ideal proving ground for agent-driven cross-border commerce, thanks to a combination of national payment strategies, digital infrastructure readiness, and regulatory ambition, represented in fintech sandboxes. 

Unlike traditional e-commerce, where shoppers manually execute every step, agentic commerce transforms the shopping process into agent-led execution, where AI agents handle tasks autonomously on the user's behalf, according to predefined instructions, only waiting for human approvals on final steps like payment or substitutions. Additionally, agentic systems elevate AI to proactive autonomy, using shopper constraints to add items to carts, negotiate deals, or resolve issues, such as out-of-stock swaps, adapting in real-time via APIs. 

Agentic commerce could be highly rewarding for Saudi retailers across several key areas:

• Double revenue and conversion growth. AI agents can boost cart conversions and reduce cancellations through proactive interventions like real-time guidance and deal negotiations.
• Enhance operational efficiency. By automating inventory management, dynamic pricing, and catalog updates, AI agents minimize manual effort and enable real-time decisions, ultimately cutting inventory costs.
• Improve customer experience. Hyper-personalization at scale fosters loyalty by anticipating needs, guiding multi-channel journeys, and handling post-purchase support, shortening decision cycles.
• Prevent fraud and reduce risks. Real-time fraud detection via agent verification and cryptographic checks secures payments, while backend agents manage settlements.

Challenges and Concerns

The path to implementing agentic commerce in Saudi Arabia presents distinct challenges that must be carefully addressed for successful adoption:

• Regulatory and compliance hurdles. Retailers face challenges in encoding SAMA and Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority (ZATCA) regulations into AI agents to ensure autonomous transactions comply with local payment rules, such as Mada authentication, without human intervention. Data sovereignty demands under SDAIA guidelines require agents to process Arabic data locally, complicating cross-border remittances flow; thus, merchants must adapt application programming interface (APIs) for agentic access, as traditional sites risk invisibility to AI shoppers scanning for real-time pricing and stock.
• Technical integration and adoption barriers. Legacy systems hinder agent integration, with many Saudi small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) lacking open APIs for dynamic pricing or inventory. Additionally, reskilling the human workforce could be a major challenge for merchants transitioning from manual e-commerce to overseeing autonomous systems. 
• Consumer trust. Successful adoption of agentic commerce in Saudi Arabia hinges on overcoming key barriers to consumer trust, which stem from privacy risks, accountability gaps, and a lack of transparency. These issues require specific, proactive mitigations.
• Privacy concerns. Autonomous agents require extensive user data, raising fears about compliance with the SDAIA's Personal Data Protection Law and general data security.
• Accountability gaps. Errors in agent-led transactions create ambiguity over liability, demanding updates to frameworks to address non-human actors.
• Transparency and bias. A lack of clarity in AI decisions, coupled with risks of cultural bias in Arabic-language models, fails to meet the expectations of mobile-savvy Saudi consumers accustomed to manual control.

The question is not whether agentic commerce will arrive in Saudi Arabia, but whether it will become the defining force of the Kingdom's next economic chapter. The foundations are certainly strong: a booming digital payments infrastructure, a strategic national vision actively promoting technological adoption, and a young, mobile-first population eager for innovation. The potential rewards for Saudi retailers are transformative, enabling doubled conversion rates, streamlined operations, and an unprecedented hyper-personalized customer experience that builds lasting loyalty. 

The future of agentic commerce in Saudi Arabia hinges on navigating critical challenges: regulatory integration, technical interoperability, and, above all, building robust consumer trust.

Ultimately, the trajectory of agentic commerce in the Kingdom will be decided by a strategic collaboration between retailers, regulators, and technologists to build an agentic future that is not only efficient and profitable but also secure, trustworthy, and authentically aligned with Saudi consumer values.